<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did Nestle Leave McCloud? Nestle&#8217;s &#8220;Truth&#8221; Isn&#8217;t Necessarily Mine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/09/16/why-did-nestle-leave-mccloud-nestles-truth-isnt-necessarily-mine/888/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/09/16/why-did-nestle-leave-mccloud-nestles-truth-isnt-necessarily-mine/888</link>
	<description>Protecting our rural waters and economies from Nestle's bottled water plants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:25:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles scamman</title>
		<link>http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/09/16/why-did-nestle-leave-mccloud-nestles-truth-isnt-necessarily-mine/888/comment-page-1#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>charles scamman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopnestlewaters.org/?p=888#comment-764</guid>
		<description>TC,
THANK YOU for your fine efforts.  I hope that this victory will not curtail the fine work you&#039;ve done for this issue on this web site

Like you, I&#039;ve noted that here in Maine, Nestle does not &quot;lie&quot;, but does not reveal the entire truth.  I pointed this on in several letters about the &quot;possibility&quot; of the NAFTA and GATT treaties coming into play.  (We&#039;ve obtained legal opinions to support this conjecture).  Nestle posted that neither relates to water &quot;in it&#039;s natural state in the ground&quot; which IS true, but once water is extracted it becomes a &#039;commodity&#039; under GATT and once flow across boarders starts, the &quot;proportionality clause&quot; of the NAFTA could kick in.  

Also, there is no guarantee that a water &quot;bottling&quot; operation can not transform into a &#039;bulk water&#039; company overnight at the whim of corporate leaders.  I &quot;suspect&quot; that this is why Nestle is still going after water rights when bottled water sales are falling.  No, Nestle would not send in mercenaries to &#039;take&#039; the water, they would send in the team of lawyers to bankrupt individuals, small communities and states that resisted (in my opinion).

Anyway, you deserve a great deal of the credit for this victory in my opinion, and I hope that you continue for the benefit of the rest of the nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TC,<br />
THANK YOU for your fine efforts.  I hope that this victory will not curtail the fine work you&#8217;ve done for this issue on this web site</p>
<p>Like you, I&#8217;ve noted that here in Maine, Nestle does not &#8220;lie&#8221;, but does not reveal the entire truth.  I pointed this on in several letters about the &#8220;possibility&#8221; of the NAFTA and GATT treaties coming into play.  (We&#8217;ve obtained legal opinions to support this conjecture).  Nestle posted that neither relates to water &#8220;in it&#8217;s natural state in the ground&#8221; which IS true, but once water is extracted it becomes a &#8216;commodity&#8217; under GATT and once flow across boarders starts, the &#8220;proportionality clause&#8221; of the NAFTA could kick in.  </p>
<p>Also, there is no guarantee that a water &#8220;bottling&#8221; operation can not transform into a &#8216;bulk water&#8217; company overnight at the whim of corporate leaders.  I &#8220;suspect&#8221; that this is why Nestle is still going after water rights when bottled water sales are falling.  No, Nestle would not send in mercenaries to &#8216;take&#8217; the water, they would send in the team of lawyers to bankrupt individuals, small communities and states that resisted (in my opinion).</p>
<p>Anyway, you deserve a great deal of the credit for this victory in my opinion, and I hope that you continue for the benefit of the rest of the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

