<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chaffee County Commissioners Approve Nestle Water Extraction Project&#8230; With 40 Stipulations Attached</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/08/21/chaffee-county-commissioners-approve-nestle-water-extraction-project-with-40-stipulations-attached/827/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/08/21/chaffee-county-commissioners-approve-nestle-water-extraction-project-with-40-stipulations-attached/827</link>
	<description>Protecting our rural waters and economies from Nestle's bottled water plants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:25:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/08/21/chaffee-county-commissioners-approve-nestle-water-extraction-project-with-40-stipulations-attached/827/comment-page-1#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopnestlewaters.org/?p=827#comment-715</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting - yet utterly familiar - case. What&#039;s stunning is the fact that real economic benefits to the area are lacking, the negatives are plentiful (traffic, lifestyle, loss of a scarce resource, inhibition to future economic development), and yet people continue to claim that this might spur &quot;economic development&quot; in the area.

How could it possibly? There&#039;s no jobs and no plant - just another strain on road infrastructure and another resource removed from the watershed?

As for monitoring, you make an excellent point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting &#8211; yet utterly familiar &#8211; case. What&#8217;s stunning is the fact that real economic benefits to the area are lacking, the negatives are plentiful (traffic, lifestyle, loss of a scarce resource, inhibition to future economic development), and yet people continue to claim that this might spur &#8220;economic development&#8221; in the area.</p>
<p>How could it possibly? There&#8217;s no jobs and no plant &#8211; just another strain on road infrastructure and another resource removed from the watershed?</p>
<p>As for monitoring, you make an excellent point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Stone - Westcliffe CO</title>
		<link>http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/08/21/chaffee-county-commissioners-approve-nestle-water-extraction-project-with-40-stipulations-attached/827/comment-page-1#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Stone - Westcliffe CO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopnestlewaters.org/?p=827#comment-714</guid>
		<description>How irresponsible! Another example of our elected officials not acting in the best interest of the public! Just how does the Commisions Court plan on reviewing and interpreting the data that will be provided. Just the cost of storing the data alone will offset any expected financial gain from this project.
Water is a precious commodity. Let&#039;s not just give it away. Our children will need it to exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How irresponsible! Another example of our elected officials not acting in the best interest of the public! Just how does the Commisions Court plan on reviewing and interpreting the data that will be provided. Just the cost of storing the data alone will offset any expected financial gain from this project.<br />
Water is a precious commodity. Let&#8217;s not just give it away. Our children will need it to exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

