<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Florida Bottlers May Start Paying For Water They Now Pump&#8230; for Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/03/03/florida-bottlers-may-start-paying-for-water-they-now-pump-for-free/546/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/03/03/florida-bottlers-may-start-paying-for-water-they-now-pump-for-free/546</link>
	<description>Protecting our rural waters and economies from Nestle's bottled water plants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:25:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/03/03/florida-bottlers-may-start-paying-for-water-they-now-pump-for-free/546/comment-page-1#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/03/03/florida-bottlers-may-start-paying-for-water-they-now-pump-for-free/546#comment-664</guid>
		<description>Nestle - and the bottled water industry - managed to not only defeat the resource severance tax (which many companies pay when they &quot;sever&quot; a resource from the land - a good description of Nestle&#039;s bottling efforts), but they even beat the rule that would have closed the sales tax loophole enjoyed by bottled water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nestle &#8211; and the bottled water industry &#8211; managed to not only defeat the resource severance tax (which many companies pay when they &#8220;sever&#8221; a resource from the land &#8211; a good description of Nestle&#8217;s bottling efforts), but they even beat the rule that would have closed the sales tax loophole enjoyed by bottled water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabel Carr</title>
		<link>http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/03/03/florida-bottlers-may-start-paying-for-water-they-now-pump-for-free/546/comment-page-1#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Isabel Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stopnestlewaters.org/2009/03/03/florida-bottlers-may-start-paying-for-water-they-now-pump-for-free/546#comment-663</guid>
		<description>So, why was the Governor&#039;s suggestion that Nestle start paying such a bad idea?  As I recall, the outrage that came in as Op Eds were from paid minions of the water company.  All businesses have some kind of overhead.  They pay for their raw products and every conceivable kind of tax.  Why shouldn&#039;t Nestle pay something for the use of the water that they can sell as the country&#039;s finest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, why was the Governor&#8217;s suggestion that Nestle start paying such a bad idea?  As I recall, the outrage that came in as Op Eds were from paid minions of the water company.  All businesses have some kind of overhead.  They pay for their raw products and every conceivable kind of tax.  Why shouldn&#8217;t Nestle pay something for the use of the water that they can sell as the country&#8217;s finest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

